mail archive Transport Area Working Group
tsvwg.ietf.org
(List home) (Recent threads) (187 other Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) lists)
Subscription Options
- RSS or Atom: Read-only subscription using a browser or aggregator. This is the recommended way if you don't need to send messages to the list. You can learn more about feed syndication and clients here.
- Conventional: All messages are delivered to your mail address, and you can reply. To subscribe, send an email to the list's subscribe address with "subscribe" in the subject line, or visit the list's homepage here.
- Low traffic list: less than 3 messages per day
- This list contains about 1,176 messages, beginning Mar 2011
- 0 messages added yesterday
Transport Area Working Group
April 2012
Jose Saldana — 133335452302 Apr 2012
In this message I try to answer some of the questions that have been sent to the list. I think the main questions are: 1) Does the draft intend to obs...
TSV draft notes Paris (Draft) (2 Replies)
gorry — 133346618703 Apr 2012*
The draft notes from this week's TSVWG meeting have been uploaded here: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/mi... - Please send comment/cor...
A suggestion for draft-polk-tsvwg-rfc4594-update (3 Replies)
Jose Saldana — 133457956616 Apr 2012*
Although I am mainly interested on online games, in my university there are more serious people working on Telemedicine services. I was wondering if i...
RFC5865 (3194) (2 Replies)
RFC Errata System — 133468771817 Apr 2012*
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5865, "A Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) for Capacity-Admitted Traffic". -- ...
<Karen.Nielsen — 133473559018 Apr 2012
Hi, I am sorry to bother you again. My emails to tsvwg generally bounces back... I do not know if you are interested in the following topic. We have c...
Gorry Fairhurst — 133520221323 Apr 2012*
This email announces the start of a working group last call for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps, "UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Packets". Follo...
Jose Saldana — 133525890324 Apr 2012*
Ruediger, Thank you for your fast response. I will separately answer the two parts of your email. First, this message about the tunnels. This afternoo...
Brian Trammell — 133529599824 Apr 2012*
Greetings, all, Apologies for missing the WGLC end on this draft; however as it appears it may be rev'd anyway on the MTU DF question, I hope the ...
Gorry Fairhurst — 133542324026 Apr 2012
TSVWG... please note the following WGLC in the 6man WG to update the UDP spec when used with IPv6. If you have transport comments or think this update...
Gorry Fairhurst — 133542325026 Apr 2012
TSVWG... please note the following WGLC in the 6man WG this I-D presents transport-layer issues for the proposed update the UDP spec with IPv6. If you...
About draft-polk-tsvwg-rfc4594-update-00.txt (12 Replies)
Jose Saldana — 133551550827 Apr 2012*
James, After returning home from IETF 83, I have been reading your draft. I find it interesting to standardize the service classes. Otherwise, if each...