mail archive imports.openstreetmap.org
(List home) (Recent threads) (77 other OpenStreetMap lists)
Subscription Options
- RSS or Atom: Read-only subscription using a browser or aggregator. This is the recommended way if you don't need to send messages to the list. You can learn more about feed syndication and clients here.
- Conventional: All messages are delivered to your mail address, and you can reply. To subscribe, send an email to the list's subscribe address with "subscribe" in the subject line, or visit the list's homepage here.
- Low traffic list: less than 3 messages per day
- This list contains about 1,961 messages, beginning Jul 2009
- 0 messages added yesterday
Report the Spam
This button sends a spam report to the moderator. Please use it sparingly. For other removal requests, read this.
Are you sure? yes no
Re: [Imports] Spanish Cadastre ELEMTEX
Ad
2012/6/7 :
> Today's Topics:
>
> 3. Re: Spanish Cadastre ELEMTEX (Jaime Crespo)
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:47:35 +0200
> From: Jaime Crespo
> To: Paul Norman
> Cc: Javier S?nchez ,
> Subject: Re: [Imports] Spanish Cadastre ELEMTEX
>
> 2012/6/7 Paul Norman :
>
>> If you find a good solution for this problem, please document it and let
>> everyone know as it is a big problem with imports done by multiple people
>> who may have varying standards.
>
> This is just an idea, but the other day, a technical solution with of
> a JOSM plugin + private API server for for distributed editing
> [corrections] before final upload to OSM was sketched with some
> colleges. Please note that I am not part of the original conversion
> tool, either.
>
> Basically, raw exports of converted data would be first imported into
> a read-only private server (only for importing purposes and limited to
> Spain). Secondly, through the plugin, any user could download to
> his/her client a small, a consistent and small area on a different
> layer. The OSM and import layers would be then merged on a manual
> basis. Then, user would be able to upload to OSM server as usual. It
> is a huge amount of work, but quality control could be done both at
> the server (private one) and client side (JOSM plugin) and it would
> avoid automatic and large imports, and manage user accounts correctly.
> It could also avoid duplicate content as it may mark uploaded objects
> as such.
>
> We recently got some hardware to make this possible, and even got the
> server side software stack installed but I lack myself of enough time
> to program all the other stuff.
>
> What do you think? It is worth the effort? Could the plugin be reused
> somewhere else?
> --
> Jaime CrespoHello.
I think it really worth it. Can you give me some more information? ? Can I help?
Javier