... But the short answer is that yes, coordinated configuration of MG
and MGC is necessary.On 13/06/2012 3:01 AM, Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht) wrote:
> See e.g. H.248 profile specification from ETSI:
> TS 183 002 for access gateways
> ES 283 024 for trunking gateways
> => sections on termination names
>
> ________________________________
> From: On Behalf Of Kapil gupta
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2012 05:30
> To:
> Subject: [Megaco] MEGACO Message Termination-Id mapping to SS7 TDM channel
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am working on Signaling Gateway which also supports MEGACO commands to providie Media Gateway functionality.
>
> When MGC sends MEGACO command , he specifiies the termination-id , how will I determine that termination id mentioned in Megaco message will map to which TDM channel id ?
>
>> From the spec, I got information that termination-id format will be choosen by Media Gateway,
>
> Is it some kind of configuration which needs to be done in MG as well as in MGC ?
>
> any response would be really appriciared !!
>
> thanks a lot.
>
> Best Regards,
> Kapil
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco