ArchiveOrangemail archive

opensuse-java.opensuse.org


(List home) (Recent threads) (97 other OpenSUSE lists)

Subscription Options

  • RSS or Atom: Read-only subscription using a browser or aggregator. This is the recommended way if you don't need to send messages to the list. You can learn more about feed syndication and clients here.
  • Conventional: All messages are delivered to your mail address, and you can reply. To subscribe, send an email to the list's subscribe address with "subscribe" in the subject line, or visit the list's homepage here.
  • Low traffic list: less than 3 messages per day
  • This list contains about 222 messages, beginning Apr 2008
  • 0 messages added yesterday
Report the Spam
This button sends a spam report to the moderator. Please use it sparingly. For other removal requests, read this.
Are you sure? yes no

Focusing on OpenJDK - Sun/Oracle JDK will not be in 12.1

Ad
Andreas Jaeger 1314866944Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:49:04 +0000 (UTC)
Up to now, openSUSE users had the choice of using openJDK (GPL with classpath 
exceptions) or Sun/Oracle's Java. The Sun/Oracle Java was licensed under the 
"Distributor's License for Java (DLJ)", which allowed Linux distributors to 
package and redistribute Sun/Oracle Java. Recently, Oracle announced [1] that 
openJDK 7 is the new official reference implementation for Java SE7. They no 
longer see the need for the DLJ licensed Java implementation and so have 
retired that license.
openSUSE chooses to proceed with distributing the GPL licensed official 
reference implementation, openJDK. We will no longer distribute newer versions 
or updates of the now proprietary licensed Sun/Oracle JDK. Existing 
installations of the Sun/Oracle JDK are still licensed under the now retired 
DLJ. openSUSE users who wish to continue using the Sun/Oracle JDK (including 
new versions thereof and updates) should now download directly from 
http://www.oracle.com/java. For now we keep the current sun-java packages 
(under the DLJ license) in the Java:sun:Factory project and will not update 
them anymore.

I suggest to document in the openSUSE wiki how to install the Sun/Oracle JDK 
version from Oracle under openSUSE.

Andreas-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE
  aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Message missing here (more information)
Andreas Jaeger 1314953210Fri, 02 Sep 2011 08:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
On Friday, September 02, 2011 06:34:39 AM Joaquin Sosa wrote:
> I don't see the link to reference 1.See:
http://oracle.com/java> The issue is OpenJDK does not properly run most, if any, Java applets.
> This is a serious issue that should have been addressed in the
> roadmap, not as a sidenote to a milestone release.how could it be addressed in any roadmap if Oracle without warning removes 
their license?

See:
http://jdk-distros.java.net/
http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html

and the reaction from Debian:
sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_removed_from_debian_u

Andreas-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE
  aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Andreas Jaeger 1314955177Fri, 02 Sep 2011 09:19:37 +0000 (UTC)
On Friday, September 02, 2011 06:34:39 AM Joaquin Sosa wrote:
> I don't see the link to reference 1.
> 
> The issue is OpenJDK does not properly run most, if any, Java applets.Hope this changes, as Oracle says on http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html
"Now, with OpenJDK 7 serving as the basic for Oracle JDK 7 releases, and 
moving to run much closer in sync then OpenJDK 6 and Oracle JDK 6 did, the DLJ 
is no longer necessary."

so, if there are bugs, report them - this is Oracle's decision and we're just 
hit by the consequences ;(

Andreas-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE
  aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Manfred Riem 1315009766Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:29:26 +0000 (UTC)
Hi all,

I assume Oracle means it to read "the DLJ is no longer necessary for JDK 7
and up. "
So I am a bit unsure why JDK6 won't be in 12.1? Even though JDK 7 is out it
is fairly
new and most if not all organizations will still be evaluating the JDK 7
release during
the lifetime of 12.1?

Thoughts?

Regards,
Manfred Riem

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 4:20 AM
To: 
Cc: 
Subject: [opensuse-java] Re: [opensuse-factory] Focusing on OpenJDK -
Sun/Oracle JDK will not be in 12.1On Friday, September 02, 2011 06:34:39 AM Joaquin Sosa wrote:
> I don't see the link to reference 1.
> 
> The issue is OpenJDK does not properly run most, if any, Java applets.Hope this changes, as Oracle says on
http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html
"Now, with OpenJDK 7 serving as the basic for Oracle JDK 7 releases, and
moving to run much closer in sync then OpenJDK 6 and Oracle JDK 6 did, the
DLJ is no longer necessary."

so, if there are bugs, report them - this is Oracle's decision and we're
just hit by the consequences ;(

Andreas
--
 Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE
  aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG
Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
For additional commands, e-mail: 




-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3870 - Release Date: 09/01/11
Andreas Jaeger 1315053458Sat, 03 Sep 2011 12:37:38 +0000 (UTC)
On Saturday, September 03, 2011 02:28:57 AM Manfred Riem wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I assume Oracle means it to read "the DLJ is no longer necessary for JDK 7
> and up. "
> So I am a bit unsure why JDK6 won't be in 12.1? Even though JDK 7 is out it
> is fairly
> new and most if not all organizations will still be evaluating the JDK 7
> release during
> the lifetime of 12.1?Ask Oracle why the revoked the DLJ for any future JDK6 version.

We could ship the version we have today but cannot update if any security 
problems are found.

Does it make sense to go to Open JDK7 for 12.1?

Andreas-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Message missing here (more information)
Andreas Jaeger 1315113562Sun, 04 Sep 2011 05:19:22 +0000 (UTC)
On Saturday, September 03, 2011 11:52:23 PM Joaquin Sosa wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 08:37, Andreas Jaeger  wrote:
> > Does it make sense to go to Open JDK7 for 12.1?
> 
> How about regular JDK 7?  It can be handled like Firefox in 11.4: the
> beta was shipped, and later updated to the final version.
> 
> http://jdk7.java.net/download.htmlRegular JDK7 is not anymore under the distributor license, so not an option,

Andreas-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Manfred Riem 1315114171Sun, 04 Sep 2011 05:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
While I would not consider it ideal I would recommend keeping the last
JDK 1.6 version that still is covered by the DLJ and ship the OpenJDK
releases
as well.

There are some issues with OpenJDK 6 that prevent some applications from
working. 

For the JDK 1.6 version a warning should/could be popped up when installing
stating it is on its way out and is merely available as a convenience. This
would
give applications time to repackage until 12.2?

Thoughts?
Manfred

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:] 
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 12:19 AM
To: 
Cc: ; Michal Vyskocil
Subject: Re: [opensuse-java] Re: [opensuse-factory] Focusing on OpenJDK -
Sun/Oracle JDK will not be in 12.1On Saturday, September 03, 2011 11:52:23 PM Joaquin Sosa wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 08:37, Andreas Jaeger  wrote:
> > Does it make sense to go to Open JDK7 for 12.1?
> 
> How about regular JDK 7?  It can be handled like Firefox in 11.4: the 
> beta was shipped, and later updated to the final version.
> 
> http://jdk7.java.net/download.htmlRegular JDK7 is not anymore under the distributor license, so not an option,

Andreas
--
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
For additional commands, e-mail: 




-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3875 - Release Date: 09/03/11
Michal Vyskocil 1315210853Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:20:53 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:28:59AM -0500, Manfred Riem wrote:
> While I would not consider it ideal I would recommend keeping the last
> JDK 1.6 version that still is covered by the DLJ and ship the OpenJDK
> releases
> as well.As it was announced - the Java:sun:Factory wont be removed, so you can
get dlj packages from here. The biggest change is it will not be updated
as the cirumstances has been changed by Oracle.> 
> There are some issues with OpenJDK 6 that prevent some applications from
> working. 
> 
> For the JDK 1.6 version a warning should/could be popped up when installing
> stating it is on its way out and is merely available as a convenience. This
> would
> give applications time to repackage until 12.2?No, if we know we cannot provide security updates, we can only drop the
package from Factory.

Regards
Michal Vyskocil
Manfred Riem 1315234484Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:54:44 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Michal,

Thanks for the clarification. Do you know how many packages are going
to be impacted by this change?

And what happens with packages that have to depend on the DLJ version?
Are they then also going to the Factory?

Regards,
Manfred

-----Original Message-----
From: Michal Vyskocil [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 3:21 AM
To: Manfred Riem
Cc: 'Andreas Jaeger'; ;

Subject: Re: [opensuse-java] Re: [opensuse-factory] Focusing on OpenJDK -
Sun/Oracle JDK will not be in 12.1On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:28:59AM -0500, Manfred Riem wrote:
> While I would not consider it ideal I would recommend keeping the last 
> JDK 1.6 version that still is covered by the DLJ and ship the OpenJDK 
> releases as well.As it was announced - the Java:sun:Factory wont be removed, so you can get
dlj packages from here. The biggest change is it will not be updated as the
cirumstances has been changed by Oracle.> 
> There are some issues with OpenJDK 6 that prevent some applications 
> from working.
> 
> For the JDK 1.6 version a warning should/could be popped up when 
> installing stating it is on its way out and is merely available as a 
> convenience. This would give applications time to repackage until 
> 12.2?No, if we know we cannot provide security updates, we can only drop the
package from Factory.

Regards
Michal Vyskocil



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3877 - Release Date: 09/04/11
Michal Vyskocil 1315297971Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:32:51 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:54:15AM -0500, Manfred Riem wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> Thanks for the clarification. Do you know how many packages are going
> to be impacted by this change?Just one - java-1_6_0-sun, which has been dropped. All others Java stuff
is build by openjdk from openSUSE 11.1, so there is no big change for
us.> 
> And what happens with packages that have to depend on the DLJ version?
> Are they then also going to the Factory?You mean from Factory, don't you? But as I said, there's no package,
which requires sun java, afaik.

Regards
Michal Vyskocil
Message missing here (more information)
Michal Vyskocil 1315210662Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:17:42 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 03:15:31AM -0400, Joaquin Sosa wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 01:19, Andreas Jaeger  wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 03, 2011 11:52:23 PM Joaquin Sosa wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 08:37, Andreas Jaeger  wrote:
> >> > Does it make sense to go to Open JDK7 for 12.1?
> >>
> >> How about regular JDK 7?  It can be handled like Firefox in 11.4: the
> >> beta was shipped, and later updated to the final version.
> >>
> >> http://jdk7.java.net/download.html
> >
> > Regular JDK7 is not anymore under the distributor license, so not an option,
> >
> 
> And what's the excuse for not providing a pullin-real-java package,
> exactly as is done with flash? Just a script to pull the download and
> install it. The software is never hosted or distributed by openSUSE.As in every other case - someone has to do it. If there is any volunteer
for such task, do not hesistate to contact me and I will help him with
getting his script into the Factory. But I am not going to do it neither
maintain such script.

Regards
Michal Vyskocil
Denny Beyer 1315384730Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:38:50 +0000 (UTC)
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 11:19:33 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
[...]
> so, if there are bugs, report them -For that it would be good to have openjdk 1.7 available in obs.> 
> AndreasDenny
Ad
Home | About | Privacy